One hears from Kate Kendall, et al. (soon the rest of the news media) that the California Supreme Court will hear challenges to Proposition 8, and has set an expedited briefing schedule.
I know close to diddly squat about things legal, but the dates at the bottom of the court order (available here) note that a “brief” may be filed by intervenors no later than December 19, and a “reply” by petitioners (presumably to that brief) no later than January 5 of next year. Amicus curiae briefs may be filed on or before January 15.
* [Maura Dolan's LA Times piece on this notes the hearing will be scheduled for March 2009. All of which serves to confirm the diddly squat remark above.]
If the court acts as swiftly as I want it to act (you know, as opposed to however damn fast or slow it needs to to think this through thoroughly), we might have a decision by our new president’s inauguration. Lord love me if it’s good news than I guarantee I will be wearing Depends undergarments on his inaugural, since I will for sure be so elated I will pee. Yes, I said it here.
Now if it’s not good news, whatever. I may still need the undergarments. I’m just not guaranteeing it.
Here’s what NCLR sent out to its mailing list (rapidly followed by EQCA):









