<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We interrupt this parenting blog to crow about a well-placed lesbian television and radio commentator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lesbiandad.net/2008/08/we-interrupt-this-parenting-blog-to-crow-about-a-well-placed-lesbian-television-and-radio-commentator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lesbiandad.net/2008/08/we-interrupt-this-parenting-blog-to-crow-about-a-well-placed-lesbian-television-and-radio-commentator/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:15:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesbian Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.lesbiandad.net/2008/08/we-interrupt-this-parenting-blog-to-crow-about-a-well-placed-lesbian-television-and-radio-commentator/comment-page-1/#comment-254485</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesbian Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lesbiandad.net/?p=673#comment-254485</guid>
		<description>Me neither, on both counts (grip and the loosening thereof).  Though the trend toward corporate monopolization has been decades in the making.  If ever the media were utterly independent.  Sigh.

(Given what a challenge it is to continue to afford to do this jobbie (LD) sans &lt;del datetime=&quot;2008-08-23T00:41:12+00:00&quot;&gt;any&lt;/del&gt; many external gestures to commercialism, etc., the whole shebang is even more poignant to me.)

Historians might point to the simple, inevitable pendulum swings of history, at least, on the matter of why the tides might be turning.  One can only take sooooo  much imbicile crypto-fascism.  

Then again, ask Gramsci; he&#039;d say we can be quite nicely programmed to swallow it all, &#039;til we&#039;ve got no stomach left.

Fixed the broke link to the &lt;i&gt;LA Times&lt;/i&gt; piece, by the way.  Thanks for the heads-up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me neither, on both counts (grip and the loosening thereof).  Though the trend toward corporate monopolization has been decades in the making.  If ever the media were utterly independent.  Sigh.</p>
<p>(Given what a challenge it is to continue to afford to do this jobbie (LD) sans <del datetime="2008-08-23T00:41:12+00:00">any</del> many external gestures to commercialism, etc., the whole shebang is even more poignant to me.)</p>
<p>Historians might point to the simple, inevitable pendulum swings of history, at least, on the matter of why the tides might be turning.  One can only take sooooo  much imbicile crypto-fascism.  </p>
<p>Then again, ask Gramsci; he&#8217;d say we can be quite nicely programmed to swallow it all, &#8217;til we&#8217;ve got no stomach left.</p>
<p>Fixed the broke link to the <i>LA Times</i> piece, by the way.  Thanks for the heads-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chumpy</title>
		<link>http://www.lesbiandad.net/2008/08/we-interrupt-this-parenting-blog-to-crow-about-a-well-placed-lesbian-television-and-radio-commentator/comment-page-1/#comment-254484</link>
		<dc:creator>Chumpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lesbiandad.net/?p=673#comment-254484</guid>
		<description>Thanks for such interesting reading. The link in your first reply is a 404 but I found the article through Google. Im glad I got past Jodie&#039;s sombre pronouncement for the Glen Greenwald post. 

His post includes the line &#039;who only explicitly sports extremist right-wing rhetoric on Sundays&#039; to describe one of the other news anchors- priceless!

Still don&#039;t understand it though- if its all about increasing ratings why are part of the audience suddenly interested in a &#039;liberal&#039; viewpoint? Were they not before? 

I&#039;ve never understood why the right has such a grip on the media in the US, nor why that grip would appear to be loosening just now.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for such interesting reading. The link in your first reply is a 404 but I found the article through Google. Im glad I got past Jodie&#8217;s sombre pronouncement for the Glen Greenwald post. </p>
<p>His post includes the line &#8216;who only explicitly sports extremist right-wing rhetoric on Sundays&#8217; to describe one of the other news anchors- priceless!</p>
<p>Still don&#8217;t understand it though- if its all about increasing ratings why are part of the audience suddenly interested in a &#8216;liberal&#8217; viewpoint? Were they not before? </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never understood why the right has such a grip on the media in the US, nor why that grip would appear to be loosening just now&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesbian Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.lesbiandad.net/2008/08/we-interrupt-this-parenting-blog-to-crow-about-a-well-placed-lesbian-television-and-radio-commentator/comment-page-1/#comment-254156</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesbian Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 06:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lesbiandad.net/?p=673#comment-254156</guid>
		<description>Addendum: Glenn Greenwald ran a fairly detailed post at his &lt;em&gt;Salon.com&lt;/em&gt; column earlier today about conservative response to Maddow&#039;s new show.  In it, he reviews the extant voices in cable news, not just on notoriously right-wing Fox, but on MSNBC and CNN, and certainly corroborates your impression, &lt;b&gt;Chumpy&lt;/b&gt;.  

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/08/21/tnr/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;The decay of serious journalism and Rachel Maddow&#039;s new show&quot;&lt;/a&gt;

Amazingly, this piece confirms what I&#039;d read earlier in the &lt;em&gt;LA Times&lt;/em&gt; piece: that -- you could knock me over with a feather -- Keith Olberman has indeed been very popular.  Bill Carter, a &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; TV critic wrote the same &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvdecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/19/rachel-maddow-to-replace-dan-abrams-on-msnbc/?hp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;earlier in the week&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;MSNBC has put heavy emphasis this year on presidential election coverage (it has given itself the tag line, &quot;The Place for Politics&quot;) and has turned to Ms. Maddow frequently both as a guest and as a substitute for the network&#039;s most popular host, Keith Olbermann. Mr. Olbermann&#039;s emergence as the signature personality on the network has led to an unofficial rebranding of MSNBC as the liberal alternative to Fox News, which is dominated by conservative hosts like Bill O&#039;Reilly and Sean Hannity.

MSNBC has been known to be seeking a way to capitalize to a greater degree on Mr. Olbermann&#039;s popularity. A program hosted by Ms. Maddow will almost certainly be a closer ideological fit with Mr. Olbermann&#039;s.&lt;/blockquote&gt;


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Addendum: Glenn Greenwald ran a fairly detailed post at his <em>Salon.com</em> column earlier today about conservative response to Maddow&#8217;s new show.  In it, he reviews the extant voices in cable news, not just on notoriously right-wing Fox, but on MSNBC and CNN, and certainly corroborates your impression, <b>Chumpy</b>.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/08/21/tnr/" rel="nofollow">&#8220;The decay of serious journalism and Rachel Maddow&#8217;s new show&#8221;</a></p>
<p>Amazingly, this piece confirms what I&#8217;d read earlier in the <em>LA Times</em> piece: that &#8212; you could knock me over with a feather &#8212; Keith Olberman has indeed been very popular.  Bill Carter, a <em>New York Times</em> TV critic wrote the same <a href="http://tvdecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/19/rachel-maddow-to-replace-dan-abrams-on-msnbc/?hp" rel="nofollow">earlier in the week</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>MSNBC has put heavy emphasis this year on presidential election coverage (it has given itself the tag line, &#8220;The Place for Politics&#8221;) and has turned to Ms. Maddow frequently both as a guest and as a substitute for the network&#8217;s most popular host, Keith Olbermann. Mr. Olbermann&#8217;s emergence as the signature personality on the network has led to an unofficial rebranding of MSNBC as the liberal alternative to Fox News, which is dominated by conservative hosts like Bill O&#8217;Reilly and Sean Hannity.</p>
<p>MSNBC has been known to be seeking a way to capitalize to a greater degree on Mr. Olbermann&#8217;s popularity. A program hosted by Ms. Maddow will almost certainly be a closer ideological fit with Mr. Olbermann&#8217;s.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesbian Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.lesbiandad.net/2008/08/we-interrupt-this-parenting-blog-to-crow-about-a-well-placed-lesbian-television-and-radio-commentator/comment-page-1/#comment-253984</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesbian Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lesbiandad.net/?p=673#comment-253984</guid>
		<description>Can you believe, &quot;quest for ratings&quot;?  So says &lt;a href=&quot;http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/2008/08/rachel-maddow-s.html#more&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the Los Angeles Times&lt;/a&gt;.  

They did go through the roof when she guest-hosted for Olberman (if memory serves).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you believe, &#8220;quest for ratings&#8221;?  So says <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/2008/08/rachel-maddow-s.html#more" rel="nofollow">the Los Angeles Times</a>.  </p>
<p>They did go through the roof when she guest-hosted for Olberman (if memory serves).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chumpy</title>
		<link>http://www.lesbiandad.net/2008/08/we-interrupt-this-parenting-blog-to-crow-about-a-well-placed-lesbian-television-and-radio-commentator/comment-page-1/#comment-253751</link>
		<dc:creator>Chumpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lesbiandad.net/?p=673#comment-253751</guid>
		<description>Wow! and Why? I thought that US TV stations-including MSNBC- were uniformly conservative and right-wing. Talent aside how DID she get the job?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! and Why? I thought that US TV stations-including MSNBC- were uniformly conservative and right-wing. Talent aside how DID she get the job?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: archaeonerd</title>
		<link>http://www.lesbiandad.net/2008/08/we-interrupt-this-parenting-blog-to-crow-about-a-well-placed-lesbian-television-and-radio-commentator/comment-page-1/#comment-253138</link>
		<dc:creator>archaeonerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lesbiandad.net/?p=673#comment-253138</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s Doctor Maddow to you.  She was a Rhodes scholar, ya know...

She&#039;s smart, she&#039;s funny, she&#039;s hot... and her laugh!  She&#039;s been my internet girlfriend for years.  I adore her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s Doctor Maddow to you.  She was a Rhodes scholar, ya know&#8230;</p>
<p>She&#8217;s smart, she&#8217;s funny, she&#8217;s hot&#8230; and her laugh!  She&#8217;s been my internet girlfriend for years.  I adore her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liza</title>
		<link>http://www.lesbiandad.net/2008/08/we-interrupt-this-parenting-blog-to-crow-about-a-well-placed-lesbian-television-and-radio-commentator/comment-page-1/#comment-252970</link>
		<dc:creator>Liza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lesbiandad.net/?p=673#comment-252970</guid>
		<description>I just realized I have had a small slice of eye candy on TV, thanks to my lovely wife. The WNBA has a few butch hotties, including the elusive long-haired butches, as do college softball and hoops. 

But this is better. Smart eye candy! Actively being smart while also being eye candy! I&#039;d rather watch smart than sweat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just realized I have had a small slice of eye candy on TV, thanks to my lovely wife. The WNBA has a few butch hotties, including the elusive long-haired butches, as do college softball and hoops. </p>
<p>But this is better. Smart eye candy! Actively being smart while also being eye candy! I&#8217;d rather watch smart than sweat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: directorgrrl</title>
		<link>http://www.lesbiandad.net/2008/08/we-interrupt-this-parenting-blog-to-crow-about-a-well-placed-lesbian-television-and-radio-commentator/comment-page-1/#comment-252935</link>
		<dc:creator>directorgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lesbiandad.net/?p=673#comment-252935</guid>
		<description>yes, so eloquently put:

we are in season


may it ever be so. 
we can take our place in the produce aisle. 
right next to the organic peaches, is my hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, so eloquently put:</p>
<p>we are in season</p>
<p>may it ever be so.<br />
we can take our place in the produce aisle.<br />
right next to the organic peaches, is my hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesbian Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.lesbiandad.net/2008/08/we-interrupt-this-parenting-blog-to-crow-about-a-well-placed-lesbian-television-and-radio-commentator/comment-page-1/#comment-252908</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesbian Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lesbiandad.net/?p=673#comment-252908</guid>
		<description>Thank you for that! A treat, the first comment, which read

&lt;blockquote&gt;I like girls who look like boys. And are smart.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;b&gt;VT&lt;/b&gt;, without wanting to be too presumptuous, I think that might mean us.  We all may just be in season.  Or at least for a day.  Which is fine by me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for that! A treat, the first comment, which read</p>
<blockquote><p>I like girls who look like boys. And are smart.</p></blockquote>
<p><b>VT</b>, without wanting to be too presumptuous, I think that might mean us.  We all may just be in season.  Or at least for a day.  Which is fine by me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virgotex</title>
		<link>http://www.lesbiandad.net/2008/08/we-interrupt-this-parenting-blog-to-crow-about-a-well-placed-lesbian-television-and-radio-commentator/comment-page-1/#comment-252904</link>
		<dc:creator>virgotex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lesbiandad.net/?p=673#comment-252904</guid>
		<description>From a few months back, pop culture blogger Bossy  (of I am Bossy) on her &quot;new husband&quot; Rachel Maddow.


&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iambossy.com/i_am_bossy/2008/05/the-only-thing.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;i am bossy: The Only Thing Standing Between Bossy And Her New Husband Is A Vagina. Or Two.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a few months back, pop culture blogger Bossy  (of I am Bossy) on her &#8220;new husband&#8221; Rachel Maddow.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.iambossy.com/i_am_bossy/2008/05/the-only-thing.html" rel="nofollow">i am bossy: The Only Thing Standing Between Bossy And Her New Husband Is A Vagina. Or Two.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

