oldLDheader

[Above: the old, with which we are now out.  Replaced by the new, with which we are now in.]

Ever since we had a second kiddle, I’ve always felt a bit sad that he wasn’t given any face time in the old header photo (sorry, Att). You know, because I know this would be among the kinds of things he would be lamenting with a therapist in a coupla decades. Wasn’t in his Baba’s blog header, back then when people were doing that “blogging” thing.

And then there was the Great Spam Attack of ‘08, which sent heiroglyphics and more all over the place. It was time to update the WordPress installation.

Then there was my longstanding desire to foreground the conversation that goes on around here, with some kind of cue on the home page. And so on and so on.

Like with every remodeling job, push led to shove and then I realized I needed a whole new shebang, a shebang which definitely exceeded my modest web literacy. I know as much HTML as I do Spanish, which spells T-R-O-U-B-L-E in any language. After harassing chums for help, a dear one fronted the means by which I could consult professionals. And so LD v.2.0 began gestation.

That was back in late April. (Remember?) The process with the firm I started with was, to put it delicately, star-cross’d, and ultimately it was the mad skillz (and consummate professionalism) of  Poles Apart Design that brought this train into the station.  Since in baseball the game win is credited to the pitcher that successfully closed it (right?), I am only too glad to honk her horn.  You should, too, if you are in need of a WordPress blog design/redesign, or content management system, or anything else for that matter.  I mean, she even finished it and posted it today, on her birthday (!), so’s it could be all gussied up in time for the BlogHer conference.

Nerdy techie details about the innards can be found on the Colophon page, by the way, along with heart-on-my-sleeve thanks to a coupla more women who make this thing work.  Frankly, the hosting and the redesign and the redesign’s underwriting, not to mention the ongoing proofreading and editorial reality-checking are all done by she-women.  It is an estrogen bath over here, people.  A perfect thing to celebrate, going into BlogHer.  

(And worry not: I have been poring over everyone’s extremely intriguing thoughts on the “mommyblogging” questions, and do intend to sober up and post about that before Friday.  I mean there’s only so much space one can allow for navel-gazing on the micro-level of this one blog, especially its cosmetics. Time to widen the gaze to the larger phenomenon, and its politics!)

Meanwhile, I will ask your forgiveness over the next week or so, as I continue to redecorate the house and restore some of the furniture, now that the construction crew has finished the job.  If you’re confused about where the kitchen or the bathroom is, do ask. I’m sure I’ll have left a hammer or an open can of paint out, too, so watch your step.

I will now go back to humming Phat-bottomed girls, you make the rockin’ world go ’round, as I wander around trying to find what boxes I put my things in.


9 Responses to “Does this redesign make my blog look phat?”

  1. 1 annz

    Wow! Wow! Wow! It’s bee-yoo-ti-ful!

    (And I’m so psyched to be the first commenter!)

  2. 2 LesbianDad

    Well, and you know, our sister in Mpls/StP Vikki did say something at the end of the previous post. Since the miracle worker at Poles Apart posted this puppy while I was dropping the girlie off at preschool. But I am happy to call it a virtual tie. :)

    Must agree, too. Phat as can be.

  3. 3 Ruffian706

    Actually, the win goes to the pitcher who last pitched before your team took the lead. If the closing pitcher inherits a lead and manages not to blow the game, they don’t get the win, just a pat on the back.

    Nevertheless…I believe the metaphor still holds! If a pitcher inherits a losing game and successfully cleans up the other guy’s mess, yep, they get the win. (Sorry if my explanation has a negative bent, I’m a Pittsburgh Pirates fan; we’re a little pessimistic.)

    And oh yeah, the new layout looks great!

  4. 4 Mrs.Micah

    Lovely. It’s beautiful/professional and I really like seeing both kids in the header.

  5. 5 Att

    Oh, I love the header. It’s adorable.

    What a nice, streamlined design.

    P.S. In reference to your last post, d’aw.

  6. 6 Vikki

    So very cool!

  7. 7 rreagler

    You did a super job with the redesign!

  8. 8 virgotex

    late to the game, but I likes it.

  9. 9 lizk

    I go out of town for a few days and you redecorate the whole place! Looks fantastic, nice and roomy, good feng-shui — and wonderful new header!

Leave a Reply

You must login to post a comment.


    LD's No on California Prop 8 fundraising

    Goal Thermometer no-on-8-cutie



    The time to step up is now.



    See that cute kid there on the right? My son. The day, this July, that my partner and I got hitched. It was our fourteenth anniversary. Help.



    300x75baumperf

    Featured election news/analysis:

    From Geoff Kors, Equality California, in an email to EQCA and No on 8 supporters, 14 Oct., 2008:
    The latest tracking polls show that if the election were held today among voters who have seen both our ads and the other side’s ads that we would WIN!



    Unfortunately, we don’t have sufficient funds to get our ads seen by all the voters who’ve seen the other side’s ads. So it’s that simple…without more funds we’ll lose.



    But we will win if we have enough money to reach voters. So DONATE NOW!



    A powerful array of motivated groups have organized against us. Yesterday’s Sacramento Bee reported that:



    “Mormons…have emerged as the leading financial contributors to the controversial Nov. 4 ballot measure. Church members have donated about 40 percent of the $22.8 million raised to pass the initiative since July.”



    What is also unfortunate is that only 30,000 people have donated to the No on 8 campaign compared to the 60,000 who have donated to the other side.



    In a state with about two million LGBT people, in a country with millions more and tens of millions of straight allies, we have to get everyone to support this fight. If every LGBT person donates we can win!
    From "Gay marriages in California surpass those in Massachusetts,", Jessica Garrison, on 7 Oct., 2008, at the Los Angeles Times.



    Data released Monday (6 Oct 08) by UCLA's Williams Institute found that an estimated 11, 000 same-sex couples were married in CA since June 17, when the court began to allow them. (Since May 2004, over 10,000 have married in Massachusetts.)



    Pastor Jim Garlow of Skyline Church in La Mesa, who has been rallying voters to pass the constitutional amendment, said: "The fact that there are big numbers doesn't change the reality that it is still bad for the country."



    Garlow, who along with hundreds of other Christians, is observing a fast until election day as a way to show his support for the proposed amendment, added: "There are enormous numbers of people doing cocaine right now. . . . Simply because large numbers of people are doing something does not make it right."


    Earlier:



    "Foes of gay-marriage ban say poll shows Prop. 8 leading," by Jessica Garrison, 8 Oct., 2008, in the Los Angeles Times.


    Previous election news/analysis links can be found at this here Election news links page.

    Lesbian Dad 101

    Lesbian Dad Lesbian Dad is written by a parent who answers to the name "Baba" and works toward a world in which amor does indeed vincit omnia.

    Still curious? You'll find a ton more on the About page. Baffled by the lingo? Peruse the Glossary. For the proper immersion experience, I highly recommend a visit to the Best of LD.

    Hispanohablantes: ¿aquí por error? Tengo una página para usted.
    Please join the conversation. If you have trouble registering to comment -- there's a link at the base of each post -- just write me and I'll do it for you.