« Weekend bonus shot, 12.09.07
Mother’s little helper »

She put her sweater on all by herself

Published December 10th, 2007 in Mostly a picture, Re: the lil' monkey.

(Tomorrow, the world.)

9 Responses to “She put her sweater on all by herself”

Feed for this Entry Trackback Address
  1. 1 Liza Dec 10th, 2007 at

    Way to go, Lil Monkey!

  2. 2 LesbianDad Dec 10th, 2007 at

    I appreciate your overlooking the tags. Facing out. At the front.

  3. 3 Studying Stones Dec 10th, 2007 at

    Can I safely assume you’ve been hearing these phrases lately?

    “No, Baba, I want to do it MYSELF!”

    “I can do it ALONE!”

    “I don’t need your help!”

    Ah, lil’ monkey’s growing up. :)

  4. 4 LesbianDad Dec 10th, 2007 at

    Mmmm yup. That would be a big 10-4.

    Maybe Baba’s growing up too.

  5. 5 LookyDaddy Dec 11th, 2007 at

    Lookout, world.

  6. 6 Shereen Dec 11th, 2007 at

    I can’t tell if that’s a triumphant face, or a defiant face. She’s got sort of a “are you lookin’ at ME?” vibe here. Come on, fess up - you didn’t… laugh, did you?

  7. 7 Julia Dec 12th, 2007 at

    That little girl will grow up to be dangerously pretty. Watch out, world of tomorrow.

  8. 8 rreagler Dec 13th, 2007 at

    Pearl dresses herself similarly. Great photo.

  9. 9 lara Dec 14th, 2007 at

    Man this cracks me up every time I look at it. It’s the hair, I think, but also the tag.

    If it’s any consolation, the other day I wore my shirt inside out to work and had to leave it that way because I’d only noticed it after my boss saw me. I figured it’d be too obvious to turn it back the right way; since we’re a casual office, maybe he’d just think it was a purposeful choice.

Leave a Reply

You must login to post a comment.

    Recent Comments

    • Ruffian706 commented on Breaking: Court will hear challenges to Prop 8* saying I'm writing from a first year law student point of view, so I qualify as a legal powerhouse much less than Caitlin, but responding to her point about the Federal Court system, I haven't heard too much to indicate this would be a great course of action. The environment seems much friendlier in state courts.
    • Lesbian Dad commented on Breaking: Court will hear challenges to Prop 8* saying Hi, Caitlin! [Date night (woot!) slowed your comment's seeing the light of day.] I am definitely not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV, nor on the internets. All's I know is that what I've heard has been that the current make-up of the federal Supreme Court is such that any arguments taken directly
    • caitlin commented on Breaking: Court will hear challenges to Prop 8* saying Hi, my name is Caitlin, and I'm a lawyer. (Hi, Caitlin.) A hearing means the lawyers for both sides will go argue before the judge. By March they'll have fully briefed the issue, meaning that the pro gay marriage folks will have submitted an opening brief, to which the anti folks will reply, to
    • Lesbian Dad commented on Breaking: Court will hear challenges to Prop 8* saying Trying to think of a sentence Elmer Fudd might utter, in which he uses the word "squeed," but was really referring to "a long speech or piece of writing, typically one regarded as tedious." Which the final ruling might indeed be. I just hope I am inspired to squeal and pee at the
    • LookyDaddy commented on Breaking: Court will hear challenges to Prop 8* saying I'm trying to coin a new word: squeed. It is the past tense of when you squeal and pee a little at the same time. I had originally thought it applied only to the toddler set, or possibly the elderly, but for a brief moment as I read this, I thought it had the chance
    • Lesbian Dad commented on Breaking: Court will hear challenges to Prop 8* saying Okay, Nancy Polikoff says that once the court hears arguments, it must issue a ruling within 90 days. Arguments are the hearing? In March? Or is the LA Times Court beat gal off? Is there a lawyer in the house?