« Reading is fun
Weekend bonus shot, 05.26.07 »

It’s a Cheney!

Published May 24th, 2007 in Miscellaney.

happygrandparents

Eeek! What’s wrong with this picture? Right! No parents!

More on the the Mary n’ Heather baby news, along with the ACTUAL official White House photo of the proud kin, from Pam Spaulding at the Blend and her berth at Pandagon. The Family Pride Blog has a piece on it, along with ample community chit-chat. And Dana at Mombian provides a synopsis of media coverage, from closeting to bumbling to — surprise! — factually accurate.

My only two cents on it today: May amor vincit omnia.

4 Responses to “It’s a Cheney!”

Feed for this Entry Trackback Address
  1. 1 Vikki May 25th, 2007 at

    Damn - I shouldn’t have looked at your blog before bed because this picture is going to give me nightmares!

  2. 2 buggedvoter May 25th, 2007 at

    Blech

  3. 3 LesbianDad May 25th, 2007 at

    Got to quote what you said to the $120B Iraq war compromise news bit you posted, in a round-up of the more consequential Vice Presidential news of the day:

    And how much will end up in a trust fund for the latest hatchling (grandchild) of Dick Cheney, who’s stock happens to be worth at least 3000% more than it was before this war started.

    Mmmmyep.

  4. 4 Blue Ox Jun 1st, 2007 at

    Oh dear goddess. Why? Why? Why did you post it, LD?

Leave a Reply

You must login to post a comment.

    Recent Comments

    • Ruffian706 commented on Breaking: Court will hear challenges to Prop 8* saying I'm writing from a first year law student point of view, so I qualify as a legal powerhouse much less than Caitlin, but responding to her point about the Federal Court system, I haven't heard too much to indicate this would be a great course of action. The environment seems much friendlier in state courts.
    • Lesbian Dad commented on Breaking: Court will hear challenges to Prop 8* saying Hi, Caitlin! [Date night (woot!) slowed your comment's seeing the light of day.] I am definitely not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV, nor on the internets. All's I know is that what I've heard has been that the current make-up of the federal Supreme Court is such that any arguments taken directly
    • caitlin commented on Breaking: Court will hear challenges to Prop 8* saying Hi, my name is Caitlin, and I'm a lawyer. (Hi, Caitlin.) A hearing means the lawyers for both sides will go argue before the judge. By March they'll have fully briefed the issue, meaning that the pro gay marriage folks will have submitted an opening brief, to which the anti folks will reply, to
    • Lesbian Dad commented on Breaking: Court will hear challenges to Prop 8* saying Trying to think of a sentence Elmer Fudd might utter, in which he uses the word "squeed," but was really referring to "a long speech or piece of writing, typically one regarded as tedious." Which the final ruling might indeed be. I just hope I am inspired to squeal and pee at the
    • LookyDaddy commented on Breaking: Court will hear challenges to Prop 8* saying I'm trying to coin a new word: squeed. It is the past tense of when you squeal and pee a little at the same time. I had originally thought it applied only to the toddler set, or possibly the elderly, but for a brief moment as I read this, I thought it had the chance
    • Lesbian Dad commented on Breaking: Court will hear challenges to Prop 8* saying Okay, Nancy Polikoff says that once the court hears arguments, it must issue a ruling within 90 days. Arguments are the hearing? In March? Or is the LA Times Court beat gal off? Is there a lawyer in the house?